W. D. Gann: Original Evidence Needed

Evidence boundary

Original text and edition supporting the claimed numerical geometry rules.

Earlier unsupported scores, precise rule claims and financial stories are not carried into the current edition. The original address remains available, but this notice is excluded from the current search inventory and sitemap.

A supported next step

Choose the exact public syllabus or original text needed for your learning question. A missing source should not be replaced with a plausible biography, guessed price or invented return.

Learning Concepts and Fresh Cases

A geometric drawing depends on axes, scale and chosen anchors. A line can appear predictive after the observations and drawing conventions have been selected. Reproducibility requires those choices to be declared before seeing the continuation.

Draw an invented sequence under two different scales and compare the same proposed angle. Identify which apparent relationship is a consequence of the drawing convention. Keep the original anchors when later observations make the first interpretation less attractive.

Retain angles, time/price relationships, cycles and Square of Nine as questions for the original text. Exact attribution remains pending edition and context. The artifact should expose scale, units, anchor selection and a non-example, not claim that an unverified numerical geometry rule guarantees market movement or reproduces an historical account.

Retained Vocabulary Reading Trail

Gann angles (1×1, 2×1, 1×2), Square of Nine, time/price squaring, geometric price theory, time cycles, anniversary dates, Gann fan.

This vocabulary preserves the earlier topic coverage. It is a list of research leads, not a verified private rulebook. Any numerical setting or author-specific parameter needs its original definition and scope before being used or attributed.